Loading HuntDB...

CVE-2020-1971

UNKNOWN
Published 2020-12-08T15:30:16.835255Z
Actions:

Expert Analysis

Professional remediation guidance

Get tailored security recommendations from our analyst team for CVE-2020-1971. We'll provide specific mitigation strategies based on your environment and risk profile.

No CVSS data available

Description

The X.509 GeneralName type is a generic type for representing different types of names. One of those name types is known as EDIPartyName. OpenSSL provides a function GENERAL_NAME_cmp which compares different instances of a GENERAL_NAME to see if they are equal or not. This function behaves incorrectly when both GENERAL_NAMEs contain an EDIPARTYNAME. A NULL pointer dereference and a crash may occur leading to a possible denial of service attack. OpenSSL itself uses the GENERAL_NAME_cmp function for two purposes: 1) Comparing CRL distribution point names between an available CRL and a CRL distribution point embedded in an X509 certificate 2) When verifying that a timestamp response token signer matches the timestamp authority name (exposed via the API functions TS_RESP_verify_response and TS_RESP_verify_token) If an attacker can control both items being compared then that attacker could trigger a crash. For example if the attacker can trick a client or server into checking a malicious certificate against a malicious CRL then this may occur. Note that some applications automatically download CRLs based on a URL embedded in a certificate. This checking happens prior to the signatures on the certificate and CRL being verified. OpenSSL's s_server, s_client and verify tools have support for the "-crl_download" option which implements automatic CRL downloading and this attack has been demonstrated to work against those tools. Note that an unrelated bug means that affected versions of OpenSSL cannot parse or construct correct encodings of EDIPARTYNAME. However it is possible to construct a malformed EDIPARTYNAME that OpenSSL's parser will accept and hence trigger this attack. All OpenSSL 1.1.1 and 1.0.2 versions are affected by this issue. Other OpenSSL releases are out of support and have not been checked. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1i (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1h). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2x (Affected 1.0.2-1.0.2w).

Understanding This Vulnerability

This Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVE) entry provides detailed information about a security vulnerability that has been publicly disclosed. CVEs are standardized identifiers assigned by MITRE Corporation to track and catalog security vulnerabilities across software and hardware products.

The severity rating (UNKNOWN) indicates the potential impact of this vulnerability based on the CVSS (Common Vulnerability Scoring System) framework. Higher severity ratings typically indicate vulnerabilities that could lead to more significant security breaches if exploited. Security teams should prioritize remediation efforts based on severity, exploit availability, and the EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) score, which predicts the likelihood of exploitation in the wild.

If this vulnerability affects products or systems in your infrastructure, we recommend reviewing the affected products section, checking for available patches or updates from vendors, and implementing recommended workarounds or solutions until a permanent fix is available. Organizations should also monitor security advisories and threat intelligence feeds for updates about active exploitation of this vulnerability.

Available Exploits

No exploits available for this CVE.

Related News

No news articles found for this CVE.

Affected Products

References

https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20201208.txt (CNA)
https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=f960d81215ebf3f65e03d4d5d857fb9b666d6920 (CNA)
https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=2154ab83e14ede338d2ede9bbe5cdfce5d5a6c9e (CNA)
https://www.debian.org/security/2020/dsa-4807 (CNA)
https://security.FreeBSD.org/advisories/FreeBSD-SA-20:33.openssl.asc (CNA)
https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2020/12/msg00021.html (CNA)
https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2020/12/msg00020.html (CNA)
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/DGSI34Y5LQ5RYXN4M2I5ZQT65LFVDOUU/ (CNA)
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rbb769f771711fb274e0a4acb1b5911c8aab544a6ac5e8c12d40c5143%40%3Ccommits.pulsar.apache.org%3E (CNA)
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/PWPSSZNZOBJU2YR6Z4TGHXKYW3YP5QG7/ (CNA)
https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202012-13 (CNA)
https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpujan2021.html (CNA)
https://www.tenable.com/security/tns-2020-11 (CNA)
https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20201218-0005/ (CNA)
https://kb.pulsesecure.net/articles/Pulse_Security_Advisories/SA44676 (CNA)
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r63c6f2dd363d9b514d0a4bcf624580616a679898cc14c109a49b750c%40%3Cdev.tomcat.apache.org%3E (CNA)
https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuApr2021.html (CNA)
https://www.tenable.com/security/tns-2021-10 (CNA)
https://www.tenable.com/security/tns-2021-09 (CNA)
https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20210513-0002/ (CNA)
https://www.oracle.com//security-alerts/cpujul2021.html (CNA)
http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/09/14/2 (CNA)
https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuoct2021.html (CNA)
https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuapr2022.html (CNA)
https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-389290.pdf (CNA)
https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20240621-0006/ (CNA)

Credits & Acknowledgments

David Benjamin (Google)

EU Vulnerability Database

Monitored by ENISA for EU cybersecurity

EU Coordination

Not EU Coordinated

Exploitation Status

No Known Exploitation

ENISA Analysis

Malicious code in bioql (PyPI)

Affected Products (ENISA)

openssl
openssl

ENISA Scoring

CVSS Score (3.1)

5.9
/10
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

EPSS Score

0.330
probability

ENISA References

https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2020-1971.html
https://www.debian.org/security/2020/dsa-4807
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2021:0495
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2021:0494
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2021:0491
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2021:0489
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2021:0488
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2021:0486
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2021:0056
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2020:5642
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2020:5641
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2020:5640
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2020:5639
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2020:5637
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2020:5623
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2020:5588
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2020:5566
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2020:5476
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2020:5422
https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2020-1971
https://advisories.mageia.org/CVE-2020-1971.html
https://security.archlinux.org/CVE-2020-1971
https://alas.aws.amazon.com/cve/html/CVE-2020-1971.html
https://linux.oracle.com/cve/CVE-2020-1971.html
https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20201208.txt
https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=f960d81215ebf3f65e03d4d5d857fb9b666d6920
https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=2154ab83e14ede338d2ede9bbe5cdfce5d5a6c9e
https://security.FreeBSD.org/advisories/FreeBSD-SA-20:33.openssl.asc
https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2020/12/msg00021.html
https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2020/12/msg00020.html
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/DGSI34Y5LQ5RYXN4M2I5ZQT65LFVDOUU/
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rbb769f771711fb274e0a4acb1b5911c8aab544a6ac5e8c12d40c5143%40%3Ccommits.pulsar.apache.org%3E
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/PWPSSZNZOBJU2YR6Z4TGHXKYW3YP5QG7/
https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202012-13
https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpujan2021.html
https://www.tenable.com/security/tns-2020-11
https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20201218-0005/
https://kb.pulsesecure.net/articles/Pulse_Security_Advisories/SA44676
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r63c6f2dd363d9b514d0a4bcf624580616a679898cc14c109a49b750c%40%3Cdev.tomcat.apache.org%3E
https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuApr2021.html
https://www.tenable.com/security/tns-2021-10
https://www.tenable.com/security/tns-2021-09
https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20210513-0002/
https://www.oracle.com//security-alerts/cpujul2021.html
http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/09/14/2
https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuoct2021.html
https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuapr2022.html
https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-389290.pdf
https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20240621-0006/

Data provided by ENISA EU Vulnerability Database. Last updated: October 3, 2025

GitHub Security Advisories

Community-driven vulnerability intelligence from GitHub

⚠ Unreviewed HIGH

GHSA-whf2-mq76-2fhv

Advisory Details

The X.509 GeneralName type is a generic type for representing different types of names. One of those name types is known as EDIPartyName. OpenSSL provides a function GENERAL_NAME_cmp which compares different instances of a GENERAL_NAME to see if they are equal or not. This function behaves incorrectly when both GENERAL_NAMEs contain an EDIPARTYNAME. A NULL pointer dereference and a crash may occur leading to a possible denial of service attack. OpenSSL itself uses the GENERAL_NAME_cmp function for two purposes: 1) Comparing CRL distribution point names between an available CRL and a CRL distribution point embedded in an X509 certificate 2) When verifying that a timestamp response token signer matches the timestamp authority name (exposed via the API functions TS_RESP_verify_response and TS_RESP_verify_token) If an attacker can control both items being compared then that attacker could trigger a crash. For example if the attacker can trick a client or server into checking a malicious certificate against a malicious CRL then this may occur. Note that some applications automatically download CRLs based on a URL embedded in a certificate. This checking happens prior to the signatures on the certificate and CRL being verified. OpenSSL's s_server, s_client and verify tools have support for the "-crl_download" option which implements automatic CRL downloading and this attack has been demonstrated to work against those tools. Note that an unrelated bug means that affected versions of OpenSSL cannot parse or construct correct encodings of EDIPARTYNAME. However it is possible to construct a malformed EDIPARTYNAME that OpenSSL's parser will accept and hence trigger this attack. All OpenSSL 1.1.1 and 1.0.2 versions are affected by this issue. Other OpenSSL releases are out of support and have not been checked. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1i (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1h). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2x (Affected 1.0.2-1.0.2w).

CVSS Scoring

CVSS Score

7.5

CVSS Vector

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

References

Advisory provided by GitHub Security Advisory Database. Published: May 24, 2022, Modified: June 21, 2024

References

Published: 2020-12-08T15:30:16.835255Z
Last Modified: 2024-09-17T02:57:20.238Z
Copied to clipboard!