Loading HuntDB...

CVE-2023-31146

HIGH
Published 2023-05-11T20:51:51.666Z
Actions:

Expert Analysis

Professional remediation guidance

Get tailored security recommendations from our analyst team for CVE-2023-31146. We'll provide specific mitigation strategies based on your environment and risk profile.

CVSS Score

V3.1
9.1
/10
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
Base Score Metrics
Exploitability: N/A Impact: N/A

EPSS Score

v2023.03.01
0.002
probability
of exploitation in the wild

There is a 0.2% chance that this vulnerability will be exploited in the wild within the next 30 days.

Updated: 2025-01-25
Exploit Probability
Percentile: 0.541
Higher than 54.1% of all CVEs

Attack Vector Metrics

Attack Vector
NETWORK
Attack Complexity
LOW
Privileges Required
NONE
User Interaction
NONE
Scope
UNCHANGED

Impact Metrics

Confidentiality
NONE
Integrity
HIGH
Availability
HIGH

Description

Vyper is a Pythonic smart contract language for the Ethereum virtual machine. Prior to version 0.3.8, during codegen, the length word of a dynarray is written before the data, which can result in out-of-bounds array access in the case where the dynarray is on both the lhs and rhs of an assignment. The issue can cause data corruption across call frames. The expected behavior is to revert due to out-of-bounds array access. Version 0.3.8 contains a patch for this issue.

Available Exploits

No exploits available for this CVE.

Related News

No news articles found for this CVE.

Affected Products

GitHub Security Advisories

Community-driven vulnerability intelligence from GitHub

✓ GitHub Reviewed HIGH

Vyper vulnerable to OOB DynArray access when array is on both LHS and RHS of an assignment

GHSA-3p37-3636-q8wv

Advisory Details

### Impact during codegen, the length word of a dynarray is written before the data, which can result in OOB array access in the case where the dynarray is on both the lhs and rhs of an assignment. here is a minimal example producing the issue: ```vyper a:DynArray[uint256,3] @external def test() -> DynArray[uint256,3]: self.a = [1,2,3] self.a = empty(DynArray[uint256,3]) self.a = [self.a[0],self.a[1],self.a[2]] return self.a # return [1,2,3] ``` and here is an example demonstrating the issue can cause data corruption across call frames: ```vyper @external def test() -> DynArray[uint256,3]: self.a() return self.b() # return [1,2,3] @internal def a(): a: uint256 = 0 b: uint256 = 1 c: uint256 = 2 d: uint256 = 3 @internal def b() -> DynArray[uint256,3]: a: DynArray[uint256,3] = empty(DynArray[uint256,3]) a = [a[0],a[1],a[2]] return a ``` examples involving append and pop: ```vyper @internal def foo(): c: DynArray[uint256, 1] = [] c.append(c[0]) ``` ```vyper @internal def foo(): c: DynArray[uint256, 1] = [1] c[0] = c.pop() ``` the expected behavior in all of the above cases is to revert due to oob array access. ### Patches patched in 4f8289a81206f767df1900ac48f485d90fc87edb ### Workarounds _Is there a way for users to fix or remediate the vulnerability without upgrading?_ ### References _Are there any links users can visit to find out more?_

Affected Packages

PyPI vyper
ECOSYSTEM: ≥0 <0.3.8

CVSS Scoring

CVSS Score

7.5

CVSS Vector

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N

Advisory provided by GitHub Security Advisory Database. Published: May 12, 2023, Modified: November 19, 2024

References

Published: 2023-05-11T20:51:51.666Z
Last Modified: 2025-01-24T16:02:08.702Z
Copied to clipboard!